if you want to remove an article from website contact us from top.

    what is the difference between a supreme court opinion and a supreme court dissent? an opinion is a supreme court decision that the majority of the judges disagree with, while a dissent agrees with the decision. an opinion is a supreme court decision that the majority of the judges agree with, while a dissent disagrees with the decision. an opinion is a supreme court summary of the case, while a dissent is the final decision made on the case. an opinion is a supreme court decision suggested by one of the judges, while a dissent summarizes previous decisions on similar issues.

    James

    Guys, does anyone know the answer?

    get what is the difference between a supreme court opinion and a supreme court dissent? an opinion is a supreme court decision that the majority of the judges disagree with, while a dissent agrees with the decision. an opinion is a supreme court decision that the majority of the judges agree with, while a dissent disagrees with the decision. an opinion is a supreme court summary of the case, while a dissent is the final decision made on the case. an opinion is a supreme court decision suggested by one of the judges, while a dissent summarizes previous decisions on similar issues. from EN Bilgi.

    opinion

    opinion

    opinion Primary tabs

    With respect to law, “opinion” primarily refers to a judicial opinion, which is a court’s written statement explaining the court’s decision for the case. The opinion usually contains the following elements: name of the judge who wrote the opinion, statement of facts, the legal issues implicated, the court’s rationale and holding, and dicta.

    Some common legal phrases that use the term “opinion” include:

    “Majority opinion” is a judicial opinion that is joined by more than half the judges deciding a case.

    “Concurring opinion,” or concurrence, is the separate judicial opinion of an appellate judge who voted with the majority. Concurrences explain the appellate judge’s vote and may discuss parts of the decision in which the appellate judge had a different rationale.

    “Dissenting opinion,” or dissent, is the separate judicial opinion of an appellate judge who disagreed with the majority’s decision explaining the disagreement.

    Unlike most judicial opinions, an “advisory opinion” is a court’s nonbinding statement interpreting the law.

    “Per curiam opinion” is a judicial opinion issued under the name of the deciding appellate court. Thus, unlike most judicial opinions, per curiam opinions do not identify the judge who wrote the opinion.

    “Plurality opinion” is a judicial opinion that received the most votes of any opinion but not enough to be the majority opinion.

    “Opinion evidence,” as outlined in Rule 701 in the Federal Rules of Evidence, is witness testimony based directly on the witness’s own thoughts, beliefs, or inferences.

    “Expert opinion,” as outlined in Rule 702 in the Federal Rules of Evidence and as opposed to opinion evidence, is testimony by an expert witness: a witness who possesses specialized knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education.

    “Opinion work product” refers to material prepared by an attorney in preparation of litigation that reveals the attorney’s opinions, mental impressions, conclusions, or legal theories of the case. Opinion work product, unlike other work product, is almost never discoverable by an adversary.

    [Last updated in August of 2020 by the Wex Definitions Team]

    wex THE LEGAL PROCESS appellate procedure courts wex definitions

    Source : www.law.cornell.edu

    Anaylyzing a Seminal US Document 100% Flashcards

    Start studying Anaylyzing a Seminal US Document 100%. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.

    Anaylyzing a Seminal US Document 100%

    4.5 8 Reviews

    What is anecdotal evidence?

    a statistic or piece of data

    a comparison or analogy

    a professional or expert's testimony

    a personal story or historical example

    Click card to see definition 👆

    a personal story or historical example

    Click again to see term 👆

    What type of logical error underlies the argument that African Americans were inferior?

    genetic fallacy begging the claim

    hasty generalization

    ad populum

    Click card to see definition 👆

    genetic fallacy

    Click again to see term 👆

    1/10 Created by Harley689

    Terms in this set (10)

    What is anecdotal evidence?

    a statistic or piece of data

    a comparison or analogy

    a professional or expert's testimony

    a personal story or historical example

    a personal story or historical example

    What type of logical error underlies the argument that African Americans were inferior?

    genetic fallacy begging the claim

    hasty generalization

    ad populum genetic fallacy

    Which statement best describes the fallacy in this passage?

    Justice Taney assumes that the writers of the Constitution would agree with him about citizenship.

    Justice Taney uses the argument that African Americans are not citizens to prove that they are not citizens.

    Justice Taney assumes that the other justices on the court would agree with him about citizenship.

    Justice Taney uses the argument that Dred Scott is an enslaved person to prove that he is not a citizen.

    Justice Taney assumes that the writers of the Constitution would agree with him about citizenship.

    Which statement accurately summarizes the opinion of the court?

    The doctrine of "separate but equal" takes away African American citizens' rights to an equal public education.

    The doctrine of "separate but equal" shows that equal facilities provide equal opportunities.

    A sense of inferiority affects children's motivation to learn in a segregated system.

    Plessy v. Ferguson is based on dated psychological knowledge that should be rejected.

    The doctrine of "separate but equal" takes away African American citizens' rights to an equal public education.

    How does a writer support a counterclaim after stating it? Select three options.

    by begging the claim

    by restating the original claim

    by providing reasons

    by describing the topic

    by supporting it with evidence

    by restating the original claim

    by providing reasons

    by supporting it with evidence

    What is the difference between a Supreme Court opinion and a Supreme Court dissent?

    An opinion is a Supreme Court decision that the majority of the judges disagree with, while a dissent agrees with the decision.

    An opinion is a Supreme Court decision that the majority of the judges agree with, while a dissent disagrees with the decision.

    An opinion is a Supreme Court summary of the case, while a dissent is the final decision made on the case.

    An opinion is a Supreme Court decision suggested by one of the judges, while a dissent summarizes previous decisions on similar issues.

    An opinion is a Supreme Court decision that the majority of the judges agree with, while a dissent disagrees with the decision.

    What reasons does Warren provide in this passage to support the claim? Select three options.

    The policy of segregation increases a sense of inferiority because it is a law.

    Racially integrated schools would have little impact on educational equality.

    Racially segregated schools take away educational benefits from African Americans.

    The policy of segregation makes African American children feel inferior.

    The policy of segregation has a negative effect on the education of white children.

    The policy of segregation increases a sense of inferiority because it is a law.

    Racially integrated schools would have little impact on educational equality.

    Racially segregated schools take away educational benefits from African Americans.

    The policy of segregation makes African American children feel inferior.

    The Fourteenth Amendment stresses that anyone born or naturalized in the United States is a citizen and cannot be deprived of their rights. Which detail from the passage supports the court's reason for not using previous rulings on effects of the Fourteenth Amendment to decide this case?

    The 14th Amendment specifies that people of different races should be segregated in public schools.

    In the North, both white children and African American children were educated equally.

    The 14th Amendment's impact on public education was not addressed in previous cases.

    In the South, the 14th Amendment was thought to cover the private education of white children.

    The 14th Amendment's impact on public education was not addressed in previous cases.

    When analyzing an argument, which elements should you focus on most? Select three options.

    counterclaim claim reasons dissent evidence claim reasons evidence

    Which statement best describes an effective counterclaim to the claim in this passage?

    Because Dred Scott's parents were born outside the United States, he is not considered to be a citizen with all the rights granted by the Constitution.

    Source : quizlet.com

    What is a Supreme Court draft opinion? How the process works : NPR

    The court says it's routine for justices to circulate draft opinions internally. It's part of a larger procedure that involves deliberating, voting and assigning writers.

    What even is a draft opinion? Here's how the Supreme Court's process works

    May 3, 20221:56 PM ET

    RACHEL TREISMAN Twitter

    TV camera crews station in front of the Supreme Court building on Tuesday in Washington, D.C.

    Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

    The Supreme Court has confirmed the authenticity of the draft opinion Politico published Monday night and is pursuing an investigation into the leak. But the court is stressing that the opinion, which calls for overturning Roe v. Wade, does not yet equal the law of the land.

    "Justices circulate draft opinions internally as a routine and essential part of the Court's confidential deliberative work," it said in a Tuesday press release. "Although the document described in yesterday's reports is authentic, it does not represent a decision by the Court or the final position of any member on the issues in the case."

    LAW

    Report: A leaked draft opinion suggests the Supreme Court will overturn Roe v. Wade

    The court's internal deliberations may be confidential, but the process of getting to a final ruling isn't entirely a secret. Here's what we know about how the nation's highest court gets from consideration to conclusion.

    First come the arguments, then the private conferences

    After oral arguments end, justices typically discuss the cases with their law clerks to seek out different perspectives and form an idea of how they will vote, according to the U.S. Courts website.

    Then the justices hold what is known as a private conference (there are two scheduled per week, on Wednesday and Friday afternoons) to actually decide the case. They typically start by discussing which potential new cases to accept or reject, and then turn to the cases they've heard since their last such meeting.

    Sponsor Message

    "According to Supreme Court protocol, all Justices have an opportunity to state their views on the case and raise any questions or concerns they may have," the U.S. Courts site says. "Each Justice speaks without interruptions from the others."

    The justices speak in descending order of seniority, starting with Chief Justice John Roberts. Then, in that same order, they each cast an initial vote.

    Justices' votes determine who will write the opinions

    Once the votes have been tallied, the senior justice in the majority (either the chief justice or, if he dissents, the justice in the majority who has served on the court the longest) will assign someone to write the majority opinion.

    HEALTH

    Here's what could happen if Roe v. Wade is overturned

    POLITICS

    The Senate will vote on a bill creating a federal right to an abortion, Schumer says

    If a minority of justices believe that the case should have reached a different outcome, the seniormost justice in that group assigns someone to write a dissenting opinion. Any justice can also write a separate dissent of their own.

    And if a justice agrees with the decision but disagrees with the reasoning behind it, they may write a concurring opinion, which others have the option to join.

    How a draft opinion becomes a final ruling

    This is where the draft opinions come in, as the law website SCOTUSblog explains. The assigned justices draft and circulate opinions outlining their decision and their reasoning.

    Sponsor Message

    "The time it takes to finalize an opinion depends on several factors, including how divided the Justices are, which justice is writing the opinion, and the court's schedule," it says.

    There's always a chance that the draft opinion doesn't end up looking similar to the final opinion, NPR legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg told Morning Edition, noting that this has happened numerous times.

    HISTORY

    The original Roe v. Wade ruling was leaked, too

    A majority of justices must "sign onto" the court's opinion before it can be delivered publicly, according to the U.S. Courts website.

    "No opinion is considered the official opinion of the Court until it is delivered in open Court (or at least made available to the public)," it says.

    All cases are typically decided by the time the court goes on summer recess in late June or early July. Other than that, there aren't any rules around when exactly decisions must be released — but those that are unanimous tend to come out sooner than those that are more divisive.

    There are unanswered questions about this case

    So how exactly is this process playing out for the case in question? Politico's reporting offers potential clues as well as puzzles, according to Totenberg.

    Politico is reporting — citing an unnamed source "familiar with the court's deliberations" — that four of the other conservative justices voted along with Justice Samuel Alito in the conference they held after hearing oral arguments in December.

    Roberts' vote is unclear, according to Politico, which said it's also not known whether he will join an already-written opinion or craft his own.

    LAW

    Chief Justice Roberts calls Roe v. Wade leak a betrayal

    Totenberg says that during oral arguments, Roberts seemed to suggest that he wanted to move slowly, upholding the Mississippi law (which bans abortions after 15 weeks) at the heart of the case and leaving the basic framework of Roe otherwise intact. She adds that the idea "got no takers" at the time.

    Source : www.npr.org

    Do you want to see answer or more ?
    James 5 month ago
    4

    Guys, does anyone know the answer?

    Click For Answer