what are the most ethical decisions for the newspaper to make in this situation? select two options. tell the company that they cannot give out free ads, but offer a discount confirm the company’s expansion through other sources before reporting it accept the deal, since the company has been a loyal advertiser for years be completely transparent in reporting about the company’s attempt to trade favors contact other construction companies to tell them about the situation
James
Guys, does anyone know the answer?
get what are the most ethical decisions for the newspaper to make in this situation? select two options. tell the company that they cannot give out free ads, but offer a discount confirm the company’s expansion through other sources before reporting it accept the deal, since the company has been a loyal advertiser for years be completely transparent in reporting about the company’s attempt to trade favors contact other construction companies to tell them about the situation from EN Bilgi.
Ethical Journalism
A Handbook of Values and Practices for the News and Editorial Departments
The New York Times
Ethical Journalism
A Handbook of Values and Practicesfor the News and Opinion Departments
Introduction and PurposeThe Scope of These Guidelines
Other Standards of Behavior
Our Duty to Our ReadersPursuing the NewsPersonal Relations with Sources
Obeying the Law in Pursuit of the News
Accepting Hospitality From Sources
Dealing with the Competition
Protecting the Paper’s NeutralityProviding Financial or Other Advice
Speaking Engagements
Competitions and Contests
The Use of Borrowed Equipment
Collaboration and Testimonials
Participation in Public LifeVoting, Campaigns and Public Issues
Community Service
Advertisers, Marketing, PromotionObligations to The TimesSpeaking for The Times
Books, Movies, Reprints and CopyrightJournalistic Work Outside The TimesAppearing on Broadcast MediaSorting Out Family TiesDisclosure of Possible Conflicts
Investments and Financial TiesAffirming Good-Faith Compliance
Business-Financial, Technology and Media News
Transitional Arrangements
Annual Filing by Ranking Editors
Rules for Specialized DepartmentsSports
Culture, Styles, Dining
Art, Pictures, Technology
Automobiles Travel
Dealing with Outside ContributorsAppendixSample letter declining a gift
Sample letter declining an unsolicited award
Letter of understanding with the Newspaper Guild of New York
Introduction and Purpose
Top
The goal of The New York Times is to cover the news as impartially as possible — “without fear or favor,” in the words of Adolph Ochs, our patriarch — and to treat readers, news sources, advertisers and others fairly and openly, and to be seen to be doing so. The reputation of The Times rests upon such perceptions, and so do the professional reputations of its staff members. Thus The Times and members of its news and opinion staff share an interest in avoiding conflicts of interest or an appearance of a conflict.
For more than a century, men and women of The Times have jealously guarded the paper’s integrity. Whatever else we contribute, our first duty is to make sure the integrity of The Times is not blemished during our stewardship.
Conflicts of interest, real or apparent, may come up in many areas. They may involve the relationships of staff members with readers, news sources, advocacy groups, advertisers, or competitors; with one another, or with the newspaper or its parent company. And at a time when two-career families are the norm, the civic and professional activities of spouses, family and companions can create conflicts or the appearance of conflicts.
In keeping with its solemn responsibilities under the First Amendment, The Times strives to maintain the highest standards of journalistic ethics. It is confident that its staff members share that goal. The Times also recognizes that staff members should be free to do creative, civic and personal work and to earn extra income in ways separate from their work at The Times. Before engaging in such outside activities, though, staff members should exercise mature professional judgment and consider the stake we all have in The Times’s irreplaceable good name.
The Scope of These Guidelines
These guidelines generally apply to all members of the news and opinion departments whose work directly affects the content of the paper, including those on leaves of absence.
They include reporters, editors, opinion writers, photographers, picture editors, art directors, artists, designers, graphics editors and researchers. This group of professional journalists is what this text means by “staff ” or “staff members.”
News clerks, administrative assistants, secretaries and other support staff are generally not bound by these strictures, with two important exceptions: First, no newsroom or opinion employee may exploit for personal gain any nonpublic information acquired at work, or use his or her association with The Times to gain favor or advantage. And second, no one may do anything that damages The Times’s reputation for strict neutrality in reporting on politics and government; in particular, no one may wear campaign buttons or display any other form of political partisanship while on the job.
Our contracts with freelance contributors require them to avoid conflicts of interest, real or apparent. In keeping with that, they must honor these guidelines in their Times assignments, as set forth in Section 14.
The Times believes beyond question that its staff shares the values these guidelines are intended to protect. In the past The Times has resolved differences of view over applying these values amiably through discussion, almost without exception. The paper has every reason to believe that pattern will continue. Nevertheless, The Times views any deliberate violation of these guidelines as a serious offense that may lead to disciplinary action, potentially including dismissal, subject to the terms of any applicable collective bargaining agreement.
Our fundamental purpose is to protect the impartiality and neutrality of The Times and the integrity of its report. In many instances, merely applying that purpose with common sense will point to the ethical course. Sometimes the answer is self-evident. Simply asking oneself whether a course of action might damage the paper’s reputation is often enough to gauge whether the action is appropriate.
ELA 10
Start studying ELA 10 - Evaluating News Reporting. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.
ELA 10 - Evaluating News Reporting
4.3 13 Reviews
12 studiers in the last hour
Which questions best help determine whether a news source is reputable and objective? Select THREE options.
-
A) In what order does the news source choose to present the headlines?
B) Does the news source use language that might lead to an emotional response?
C) Is the news source primarily an online news source or a print news source?
D) Does the news source offer the news for free, or is a paid subscription necessary?
E) What type of language do the reporters use in the published news stories?
Click card to see definition 👆
A) In what order does the news source choose to present the headlines?
-and -
B) Does the news source use language that might lead to an emotional response?
- and -
E) What type of language do the reporters use in the published news stories?
Click again to see term 👆
What are the most ethical decisions for the newspaper to make in this situation? Select TWO options.
Read the scenario.
A construction company reaches out to a local newspaper with news that it will be expanding its business in the near future. The company promises to share more specific information exclusively with the newspaper in exchange for the newspaper running free advertisements for the company.
-
A) tell the company that they cannot give out free ads, but offer a discount
B) confirm the company's expansion through other sources before reporting it
C) accept the deal, since the company has been a loyal advertiser for years
D) be completely transparent in reporting about the company's attempt to trade favors
E) contact other construction companies to tell them about the situation
Click card to see definition 👆
B) confirm the company's expansion through other sources before reporting it
- and -
D) be completely transparent in reporting about the company's attempt to trade favors
Click again to see term 👆
1/10 Created by TriggeredChiken
Terms in this set (10)
Which questions best help determine whether a news source is reputable and objective? Select THREE options.
-
A) In what order does the news source choose to present the headlines?
B) Does the news source use language that might lead to an emotional response?
C) Is the news source primarily an online news source or a print news source?
D) Does the news source offer the news for free, or is a paid subscription necessary?
E) What type of language do the reporters use in the published news stories?
A) In what order does the news source choose to present the headlines?
-and -
B) Does the news source use language that might lead to an emotional response?
- and -
E) What type of language do the reporters use in the published news stories?
What are the most ethical decisions for the newspaper to make in this situation? Select TWO options.
Read the scenario.
A construction company reaches out to a local newspaper with news that it will be expanding its business in the near future. The company promises to share more specific information exclusively with the newspaper in exchange for the newspaper running free advertisements for the company.
-
A) tell the company that they cannot give out free ads, but offer a discount
B) confirm the company's expansion through other sources before reporting it
C) accept the deal, since the company has been a loyal advertiser for years
D) be completely transparent in reporting about the company's attempt to trade favors
E) contact other construction companies to tell them about the situation
B) confirm the company's expansion through other sources before reporting it
- and -
D) be completely transparent in reporting about the company's attempt to trade favors
Which statement about this list is most likely true?
Read the scenario.
The editor-in-chief of a magazine emails this list to her entire staff:
o Seek the truth without bias.
o Always fact-check your information.
o Never compromise your principles.
-
A) This list is a set of laws, because the guidelines were shared in written form.
B) This list is a set of laws, because it includes mandatory rules for the staff.
C) This list is a code of ethics, because it is a set of guidelines based on ideals.
D) This list is a code of ethics, because everyone on the staff agreed to follow it.
C) This list is a code of ethics, because it is a set of guidelines based on ideals.
Which scenarios are considered ethically acceptable for journalists? Select THREE options.
-
A) paying money to attend a conference about climate change in order to do research for an article
B) accepting money from a politician to report on an opponent, then donating the money to a charity
C) ending an investigation because it may lead to violence and disunity in a local community
D) interviewing the CEOs of two insurance companies that are competing against each other
E) using information from a wiki page to clarify information about a topic
A) paying money to attend a conference about climate change in order to do research for an article
- and -
C) ending an investigation because it may lead to violence and disunity in a local community
Policies and Standards
INFORMATION
Policies and Standards
By The Washington Post
January 1, 2021 @[email protected]#=img=#
The Washington Post building at 1301 K St. NW in Washington, D.C. (John McDonnell/The Washington Post)
Ethics policy | Verification and fact-checking standards | Corrections policy | Policy on sources | Diversity policy
To review additional policies and information, please visit terms of service, RSS terms of service, privacy policy, and submissions and discussion policy.Ethics policy
(This represents a synthesis of Washington Post policies and is not meant to be comprehensive.)
These policies are meant to guide Washington Post journalism as we deliver news and information in a rapidly changing media environment. We consider these guidelines to be a “living document” that we will continually modify and update based on feedback from our journalists, from our readers and from our perceptions of our changing needs. Because the circumstances under which information is obtained and reported vary widely from one case to the next, these guidelines should not be understood as establishing hard and fast rules or as covering every situation that might arise.
Conflict of interestThis news organization is pledged to avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of conflict of interest wherever and whenever possible. We have adopted stringent policies on these issues, conscious that they may be more restrictive than is customary in the world of private business. In particular:
We pay our own way.
We accept no gifts from news sources. We accept no free trips. We neither seek nor accept preferential treatment that might be rendered because of the positions we hold. Exceptions to the no-gift rule are few and obvious — invitations to meals, for example, may be accepted when they are occasional and innocent but not when they are repeated and their purpose is deliberately calculating. Free admissions to any event that is not free to the public are prohibited. The only exception is for seats not sold to the public, as in a press box, or tickets provided for a critic’s review. Whenever possible, arrangements will be made to pay for such seats.
We do not accept payment — either honoraria or expenses — from governments, government-funded organizations, groups of government officials, political groups or organizations that take positions on controversial issues. A reporter or editor also cannot accept payment from any person, company or organization that he or she covers. And we should avoid accepting money from individuals, companies, trade associations or organizations that lobby government or otherwise try to influence issues the newspaper covers. Broadcast organizations, educational institutions, social organizations and many professional organizations usually fall outside this provision unless the reporter or editor is involved in coverage of them.
It is important that no freelance assignments and no honoraria be accepted that might in any way be interpreted as disguised gratuities. We make every reasonable effort to be free of obligation to news sources and to special interests. We must be wary of entanglement with those whose positions render them likely to be subjects of journalistic interest and examination. Our private behavior as well as our professional behavior must not bring discredit to our profession or to The Post.
We avoid active involvement in any partisan causes — politics, community affairs, social action, demonstrations — that could compromise or seem to compromise our ability to report and edit fairly. Relatives cannot fairly be made subject to Post rules, but it should be recognized that their employment or their involvement in causes can at least appear to compromise our integrity. The business and professional ties of traditional family members or other members of your household must be disclosed to department heads.
FairnessReporters and editors of The Post are committed to fairness. While arguments about objectivity are endless, the concept of fairness is something that editors and reporters can easily understand and pursue. Fairness results from a few simple practices: No story is fair if it omits facts of major importance or significance. Fairness includes completeness.
No story is fair if it includes essentially irrelevant information at the expense of significant facts. Fairness includes relevance.
No story is fair if it consciously or unconsciously misleads or even deceives the reader. Fairness includes honesty — leveling with the reader.
No story is fair if it covers individuals or organizations that have not been given the opportunity to address assertions or claims about them made by others. Fairness includes diligently seeking comment and taking that comment genuinely into account.
TasteThe Washington Post respects taste and decency, understanding that society’s concepts of taste and decency are constantly changing. A word offensive to the last generation can be part of the next generation’s common vocabulary. But we shall avoid prurience. We shall avoid profanities and obscenities unless their use is so essential to a story of significance that its meaning is lost without them. In no case shall obscenities be used without the approval of the executive or managing editors.
If editors decide that content containing potentially offensive material has a legitimate news value, editors should use visual and/or text warnings about such material. For example, we may link to a Web page that contains material that does not meet standards for Post original content, but we let users know what they might see before they click the link by including a warning, such as “Warning: Some images on this site contain graphic images of war.”
Guys, does anyone know the answer?