if you want to remove an article from website contact us from top.

    though the outcomes of schenck and new york times differed, what did these decisions have in common?

    James

    Guys, does anyone know the answer?

    get though the outcomes of schenck and new york times differed, what did these decisions have in common? from EN Bilgi.

    Govt. Quiz Flashcards

    Start studying Govt. Quiz. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.

    Govt. Quiz

    5.0 2 Reviews

    Which best describes the precedent set by the Supreme Court in New York Times v. United States regarding government censorship?

    Click card to see definition 👆

    Government censorship is almost always unconstitutional.

    Click again to see term 👆

    Under which circumstances would protesters' right to assembly most likely be protected?

    Click card to see definition 👆

    if protesters were marching on the statehouse in favor of marriage for all

    Click again to see term 👆

    1/10 Created by piper060601

    Terms in this set (10)

    Which best describes the precedent set by the Supreme Court in New York Times v. United States regarding government censorship?

    Government censorship is almost always unconstitutional.

    Under which circumstances would protesters' right to assembly most likely be protected?

    if protesters were marching on the statehouse in favor of marriage for all

    Which issue was at the heart of New York Times v. United States?

    prior restraint

    Edwards v. South Carolina protected people's right to assemble and

    express unpopular views in a peaceful way.

    In Tinker v. Des Moines, why was it considered protected speech for students to wear armbands?

    Their action was not disruptive.

    The government tried to stop the New York Times from publishing classified material by using a concept known as

    prior restraint.

    The publication of false and damaging information about a person is referred to as

    libel.

    Though the outcomes of Schenck and New York Times differed, what did these decisions have in common?

    The government can limit speech that causes harm.

    Edwards v. South Carolina is significant because it limited states' ability to

    restrict the freedom of speech.

    According to the Supreme Court, which of these most likely prompted the arrest of the protesters in Edwards v. South Carolina?

    The protestors supported an unpopular view.

    Sign up and see the remaining cards. It’s free!

    Boost your grades with unlimited access to millions of flashcards, games and more.

    Continue with Google

    Continue with Facebook

    Already have an account?

    Sets with similar terms

    Government Unit 3.3 (Your Rights: Freedom of…

    10 terms Rileigh_Black

    Your Rights: Freedom of Expression

    10 terms Gyllian_Cunningham

    Your Rights: Freedom of Expression Quiz

    10 terms matt90718

    Your Rights: Freedom of Expression

    10 terms NancyTupsi

    Sets found in the same folder

    Govt. Assignment 4 terms piper060601 epic beginnings 17 terms Ashley_Waeltz

    Your Rights: Due Process

    10 terms okayith

    CSUSB Campaigns and Elections

    10 terms InItToNguyenIt17

    Other sets by this creator

    Multiple Choice for Final

    29 terms piper060601

    Literary Terms for Final

    34 terms piper060601

    Unit 5 Review Questions

    13 terms piper060601

    Rhetorical Devices and Terms

    70 terms piper060601

    Verified questions

    US GOVERNMENT

    Which group of people casts the official vote for the candidates running for president of the United States? A. American citizens B. electors chosen by each state C. the cabinet D. members of the Senate

    Verified answer US GOVERNMENT

    Infer Would it be legal for Congress to allow a territory of the United States to become a full State on the condition that they choose a new governor? Why or why not?

    Verified answer US GOVERNMENT

    List One general characteristic that political party leaders consider when putting forth presidential candidates is the candidates' religious beliefs. List three other characteristics , and explain why they are important.

    Verified answer US GOVERNMENT

    Name the six basic principles of governing set out in the Constitution.

    Verified answer

    Other Quizlet sets

    stress study guide 21 terms mikaelahawk14 PLUS

    Mental Health Chapter 21

    30 terms KPINTHEMFHOUSE Anth Unit 5-8 234 terms amyorbit

    Social Studies Review 4.1

    33 terms hcps-sharmar5

    Related questions

    QUESTION

    Which type of committees act as a study group with the responsibility to report their findings to the full house and senate?

    2 answers QUESTION

    How do the differences in press coverage between the initial speeches given to Congress by President Reagan in 1981 and by President Obama in 2009 support the information in this graph?

    3 answers QUESTION

    Bureaucratic discretionary authority is best defined as what?

    3 answers QUESTION

    The body of judicial precedent that is built on legal reasoning and previous interpretations of statutory laws is known as:

    10 answers 1/6

    Source : quizlet.com

    Though the outcomes of Schenck and New York Times differed, what did these decisions have in common?

    Though the outcomes of Schenck and New York Times differed, what did these decisions have in common?? >>

    Though the outcomes of Schenck and New York Times differed, what did these decisions have in common?

    Though the outcomes of Schenck and New York Times differed, what did these decisions have in common?

    This is a List of Available Answers Options :

    The government has a heavy burden to prove harm.

    The government can limit speech that causes harm.

    The government has unlimited power to limit speech.

    The government must follow the First Amendment.

    The best answer is B. The government can limit speech that causes harm..

    Reported from teachers around the world. The correct answer to ❝Though the outcomes of Schenck and New York Times differed, what did these decisions have in common?❞ question is B. The government can limit speech that causes harm..

    I Recommend you to read the next question and answer, Namely For prior restraint to apply, what must the government prove about the speech in question? with very accurate answers.

    CLICK TO SEE ANSWER

    What is wx.dhafi.link Site?

    WX Dhafi Quiz Is an online learning educational site to provide assistance and insight to students who are in the learning stage. they will be able to easily find answers to questions at school.We strive to publish Encyclopedia quizzes that are useful for students. All facilities here are 100% Free. Hopefully, Our site can be very useful for you. Thank you for visiting.

    Source : wx.dhafi.link

    Though the outcomes of schenck and new york times differed,

    The answer is B) The government can limit the speech that causes harm. Though the outcomes of Schenck and New York Times differed the both show that the Gover

    Question

    Though the outcomes of schenck and new york times differed, what did these decisions have in common?

    a-the government has a heavy burden to prove harm.

    b-the government can limit speech that causes harm.

    c-the government has unlimited power to limit speech.

    d-the government must follow the first amendment.

    Seen 5 months ago History bylesheaux

    Ask a Question

    4 Answer

    Filter 0

    The answer is B) The government can limit the speech that causes harm. Though the outcomes of Schenck and New York Times differed the both show that the Government can limit speech by people or organizations that causes it harm. Especially in the case of Schneck Vs. the United States where the decision was not it the favor Schneck. It ruled that the defendants who distributed fliers to draft age men urging them to resist induction, was in effect disrupting the draft and ruled a criminal offense. This was proof that the government had the power to limit speech if it caused harm.

    jakemendes1

    answered Seen 5 months ago Add a comment

    End Answer

    ADVERTISEMENT 0

    Although the results of the decisions made by Schenck and the New York Times were different from each other, both agreed on the viewpoint that the government is allowed to limit speech, if that speech may lead to disastrous results.

    Further Explanation:

    The Schenck vs. United States (1919) was a case heard by the United States Supreme Court, concerning the country’s involvement in World War I. When the country joined Britain and France, against Germany and its allies, in World War I, in 1917, it led to a huge outcry in the country, especially from the radical leftists and those who were sympathetic to Germany. During this period, while the government was drafting men to fight in the war, these people distributed fliers all across the country, urging men to oppose their induction into their army. They were eventually convicted, by a unanimous decision of the Supreme Court, following the opinion of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., of trying to obstruct the draft, which was viewed as a criminal offense. According to the court, given the circumstances, such actions would have dangerous consequences, and hence punishable.

    In the 1964 decision of the Supreme Court in the New York Times Co. vs Sullivan case, the 1st Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was upheld, with the court maintaining that protection of the freedom of speech limits public officials’ right to sue for defamation. In early 1960, the New York Times, in an advertisement by the supporters of Martin Luther King Jr., criticized the police in Montgomery, Alabama, for maltreating civil rights supporters. In response, L.B. Sullivan, a Montgomery police officer sued the paper for defamation in a local county court, which ruled that inaccuracies in the advertisements were defamatory in nature. This decision, when taken to the Supreme Court of Alabama by the paper, was backed. When the paper appealed against the verdict in the U.S. Supreme Court, the latter ruled that if the plaintiff in a defamation lawsuit is a public official, or one running for public office, he/she must not only prove normal defamatory elements, i.e. publishing false defamatory statements to a third party, but also that statements were made with malicious intent, i.e. either the defendant knew that statements were false, or it deliberately ignored the truth.

    In summary, it can be said that both statements were made in different times, under different circumstances. In the first case, the freedom of speech was subject to government constraints, given the circumstances, while in the second case, the freedom of speech was upheld, for the plaintiff ought to have proved that false defamatory statements were made with malicious intentions. However, the common thread binding both cases is that both agreed that the government could limit free speech if it were to cause harm to both nation and the public.

    Learn more:

    1. According to the constitution, the judicial branch of the federal government is headed by link

    2. Which statement is an accurate description of the american federal system?  link

    Answer Details: Grade: High School Subject: History

    Chapter: Your Rights: Freedom of Expression

    Keywords:

    World War I, Germany, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., 1st Amendment, Martin Luther King Jr., Montgomery, L.B. Sullivan, Alabama

    eli761029

    answered Seen 5 months ago Add a comment

    End Answer

    ADVERTISEMENT 0

    35 is your answer because i looked it up

    BellKelsey2006

    answered Seen 5 months ago Add a comment

    End Answer

    ADVERTISEMENT 0

    “destroyers for bases agreement in the destroyers for bases agreement between the united states and the united kingdom on september 2, 1940, fifty caldwell , wickes, and clemson class us navy destroyers were transferred to the toyalbnavy from the united states navy in exchange for land rights on british possessions.” i hope this you .

    trerese19861

    answered Seen 5 months ago Add a comment

    End Answer

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Number Achievement

    11.7m Questions 31.4m Answers 7k Topics 686k Users

    New Questions

    megan rode the bus to school, which is located 8 kilometers from her home. If megans frame of reference is her House, it took her 15 minutes to get home, what was the bus average velocity during the r...

    Source : hoc.info

    Do you want to see answer or more ?
    James 6 month ago
    4

    Guys, does anyone know the answer?

    Click For Answer