the joint effect of two variables acting together is called _____.
James
Guys, does anyone know the answer?
get the joint effect of two variables acting together is called _____. from EN Bilgi.
In class two Flashcards
Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards terms like A model in the form of y=Bo+B1Z1+B2Z2+ .. B2Z2 ...+ BpZp+z, A test used to determine whether or not first order autocorrelation is present is:, Which model can be used to accommodate curvilinear relationships between the independent variables and the dependent variables and more.
In class two
A model in the form of y=Bo+B1Z1+B2Z2+ .. B2Z2 ...+ BpZp+z
Click card to see definition 👆
General linear model
Click again to see term 👆
A test used to determine whether or not first order autocorrelation is present is:
Click card to see definition 👆
Durben Watson
Click again to see term 👆
1/17 Created by Reality_Williams
Terms in this set (17)
A model in the form of y=Bo+B1Z1+B2Z2+ .. B2Z2 ...+ BpZp+z
General linear model
A test used to determine whether or not first order autocorrelation is present is:
Durben Watson
Which model can be used to accommodate curvilinear relationships between the independent variables and the dependent variables
Quadratic Model
The following model y+B0+B1x1+e is referred to as a
1st order model when you want have square term
In multiple regression analysis, the word linear in the term "general linear model" refers to the fact that
Bo B1 ext of ex of 1
Serial correlation is the same as
auto correlation
The joint effect of two variables acting together is called
interaction
A test to determine whether or not first order autocorrelation is present is:
durben watson test
Which of the following teat is used to determine whether an additional variable makes a significant contribution to a multiple regression model>
Parsal f test
A variable such as z whose value is z= x1x2 is added to a general linear model in order to account for potential effects of two variables x1 and x2 acting together, this type of effect is
interaction effect
Sign up and see the remaining cards. It’s free!
Boost your grades with unlimited access to millions of flashcards, games and more.
Continue with Google
Continue with Facebook
Recommended textbook explanations
Principles of Economics
8th Edition N. Gregory Mankiw 825 explanations Microeconomics 4th Edition
Paul Krugman, Robin Wells
312 explanations
Essentials of Investments
9th Edition
Alan J. Marcus, Alex Kane, Zvi Bodie
689 explanations
Krugman's Economics for AP
2nd Edition
David Anderson, Margaret Ray
1,000 explanations
Sets with similar terms
Chapter 16-Regression Analysis: Model Building
16 terms johnpaulmccurdy ISDS 2000 40 terms marycjohn
Stat 351 final MC questions
39 terms jacob_schmidt344 MR FINAL CH 9 30 terms Elise_Fallon
Sets found in the same folder
Stats 351 short answer quizzes
37 terms Taylor_Alderman QMB Module 7 21 terms soccercutie4114 Exam #3 32 terms jaleman21 Final 40 terms onhelton
Other sets by this creator
LOG terms 19 terms Reality_Williams 582 chapter 9 11 terms Reality_Williams Ratios 14 terms Reality_Williams 13 14 terms Reality_Williams
Other Quizlet sets
Biology Lab 1051 59 terms shane_shane8 Bio bull 21 terms Ashley1762 Midterm exam 1-5900 75 terms callievas223 decisions exam 2 46 terms loydwolf100
Related questions
QUESTION
What are the two key properties of a discrete probability distribution?
14 answers QUESTION
How are the p-value/significance probability and t-statistic related?
2 answers QUESTION
Data in a time-ordered sequence will not be in measurements of?
2 answers QUESTION
What is a distribution called when the same numbers of observations are below the mean as are above the mean?
15 answers 1/6
What statistical analysis should be used to test the joint effects of two continous factors on one continous response variable?
Read 3 answers by scientists to the question asked by Martin Kocsis on Jul 30, 2019
Question
Asked 30th Jul, 2019
Martin Kocsis
University of Southampton
What statistical analysis should be used to test the joint effects of two continous factors on one continous response variable?
I have two continous explanatory variables. I assume that the interplay (joint effect) of these variables can predict a third, continous response variable.
What statistical test can be used to test whether the two factors and the response have a statistically significant relationship?
The actual project is aiming to find out whether the interplay of group size and cognitive abilities of members in a primate society can predict the centralisation of the social network.
Primates Statistical Testing Social Networks Cognitive Joints
Get help with your researchJoin ResearchGate to ask questions, get input, and advance your work.
Join for free Log in
All Answers (3)
31st Jul, 2019 Stefan Schulreich
University of Hamburg
Dear Martin,
Sounds like you are interested in what is commonly called an interaction effect. You can test this in a multiple regression where you input the two continuous explanatory variables and their interaction as predictors and the response variable as dependent variable.
To do this, you need to create the interaction term:
1. demean/center both continous explanatory variables (i.e. compute the mean for each variable and substract the mean from the individual values of each variable).
2. compute the interaction term by simply multiplying the demeaned variables (Xdemeaned x Ydemeaned).
3. Then use the demeaned variables and the interaction term as predictors in a multiple regression as stated in the beginning.
If the interaction effect gets significant, you can run further analyses to understand how the interaction looks like and how it can be interpreted.
This can be done via a so-called simple-slopes analysis - Here is a very useful tutorial on that issue (done in SPSS, but same logic in other packages):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ighASZf3eyA
Best, Stefan Cite 1 Recommendation 1st Aug, 2019 Claude Houssemand
University of Luxembourg
Dear Martin,
You have to use regression analysis. Your IV will be the two continous factors and its interaction and your DV your continous response variable. You can use SPSS or Psych R Package.
Best Cite 1st Aug, 2019 Basim Mahmood University of Mosul
Regression analysis can be involved in such investigations. Then, further deep analysis can be involved just to approve your analysis.
Good luck Cite 1 Recommendation
Similar questions and discussions
Can I study the combined effect of two independent variables on one dependent variables?
Question 20 answers
Asked 30th May, 2018
M. Mansur
RQ1. To what extent, if any, is there a relationship between project manager’s cultural intelligence and IT project success?RQ2. To what extent, if any, is there a relationship between project manager’s leadership style and IT project success?RQ3. What is the combined effect of project manager’s cultural intelligence and leadership style on IT project success?Why does the main effect become not significant when I add an interaction term in a regression model?
Question 29 answers
Asked 28th Apr, 2019
Eileen Sabbe
I've a significant positive direct effect between the DV and IV. When I add the interaction term (moderator) - the effect disappears... it's not longer significant. Also the effect of the moderator is nog significant. What's the explanation?
My IV and moderator are correlated, but there is no multicollinearity.
Please, can anyone help me out?
Multicollinearity issues: is a value less than 10 acceptable for VIF?
Question 81 answers
Asked 24th Sep, 2016
Alejandro Ros-Gálvez
Hello mates
Some papers argue that a VIF<10 is acceptable, but others says that the limit value is 5.
- "10" as the maximum level of VIF (Hair et al., 1995)
- "5" as the maximum level of VIF (Ringle et al., 2015)
Do you think there is any problem reporting VIF=6 ?
Maybe both limits are valid and that it depends on the researcher criteria...
Thank you in advance
How will you write the moderating hypothesis and direction of the hypothesis of Effect of psychological green climate on GHRM and Firm performance?
Question 7 answers
Asked 20th Apr, 2020
Alex Nsowah
I want to know how one will write a moderating hypothesis and the direction of the hypothesis for a research topic" Effect of psychological green climate on GHRM and Firm performance". So what I need is the moderator hypothesis and the direction of the hypothesis.
Thank you.
How do you interpret a negative effect for a significant indirect effect in mediation?
Question 3 answers Asked 1st Mar, 2020 Mandy Klose
X - M is significant positive
M - Y is significant negative
I understand each of these regressions
however, my indirect effect is significant negative?
what does that mean?
What is the the best statistical analysis to test the moderation effect of a variable?
Question
Stats
Flashcard Machine - ― ― ― Home Flashcards Other Stats - Test 2
Shared Flashcard Set
Shared Flashcard Set Details
Stats - Test 2 PA School 48 Other Graduate 04/08/2010
Click here to study/print these flashcards.Create your own flash cards! Sign up here.Additional Other Flashcards
Additional Other Flashcards Cards
Term
regression is used to:Definition
find the best fitting straight line that relates 2 dependent samples in populationsTerm
correlation is used to :Definition
describe the strength of the linear relationshipTerm
a correlation coefficient of +/- 1 indicates:Definition
a perfect correlationTerm
involes the linear relationship btwn one one dependent variable and multiple dependant variablesDefinition
multiple regressionTerm
used often in epidemiology studies:Definition
multiple regressionTerm
formula for Z score:Definition
score-mean/SD: Z score of +1 = 1SD above the meanTerm
which test? two independent grps w subjects randomly assigned to groupsDefinition
T testTerm
3 assumptions in the T test:1. scores represent normal distributionDefinition
2. sbj randomly selected/assgnd grps
3. variences of the 2 grps are equal
Term
numerator of the T test represents:Definition
difference btwn grp meansTerm
denominator of the T test represents:Definition
diff btwn grp variancesTerm
formula for the degrees of freedom:Definition
df= total # of df - # of grpsTerm
one vs two tail tests: which is less likely to commit a Type II error?Definition
less likely to commit a type II error using a one tailed testTerm
useful test for when the experimental design is one group that receives before/after tx:Definition
T test for paired dataTerm
Z scores are appropriate for alrge samples but the _____ is more commonly used for small samples (n<30)Definition
t-distributionTerm
max # of grps you can compare w a T test:Definition
2Term
a stat method used to test for differences among three or more tx means:Definition
ANOVATerm
2 assumptions of NOVADefinition
normally distributed datano sig diff btwn grp variances
Term
instead of a T-test the ANOVA has an:Definition
F testTerm
F ratio formula:Definition
F = btwn grp variance/within grp varianceTerm
ANOVA used to investigate the effects of ea of several independent variables and the joint effect of these variables acting together:Definition
factorial ANOVATerm
the difference btwn the tx variables are called:Definition
main effectsTerm
the ______ effect is due to the joint action of the tx variables:Definition
interaction effectTerm
multiple comparison test conducted after the primary analysis has rejected the null hypothesis:Definition
Post-hoc comparisonsTerm
multiple comparison test: comparisons of hypotheses specified before the analysis commenced; appropriate even when F test is not significant:Definition
planned comparisonsTerm
4 ex of multiple comparison tests:1. honestly significant differenceDefinition 2. newman-keuls
3. multiple range test
4. scheffe's method Term
analysis used when levels of an independent variable are ordered along a continuum.Definition
trend analysisTerm
test most used for frequency or count data; ex: (# of men,# of deaths, # women w/wo dz)Definition
Chi squareTerm
basic premise of Chi sq: number of sample observations in each category of ea variable:Definition
observed frequenciesTerm
basic premise of CHi sq: # of sample observations in ea category if the null hypothesis is true:Definition
expected frequenciesTerm
4 types of chi sq test:1. goodness of fitDefinition
2. test of independence
3. test of homogeneity
4. McNemar test Term
proportions of a normal curve: +/- 1SD = what% of scores?Definition
68.26%Term
proportions of normal curve: what % is within 2sd of mean?Definition
95.44%Term
proportions of normal curve: what % is within 3SD from mean?Definition
99.73%Term
a Z score of 1 indicates:Definition
the score is 1 SD above the meanTerm
what % of 14yo have cholesterol of >240?mean cholesterol @ 14 = 170+/-35
Definition
240-170/35 = 2SD above mean; 2.325% of 14yo have chol>240Term
likelihood that any one event will occur, given all possible outcomes:Definition
probabilityTerm
SD of a theoretical sampling distribution of means:Definition
standard error of the meanTerm
null hypotheses also reffered to as:Definition
statistical hypothesisTerm
concluding that a difference exists when none actually does
Guys, does anyone know the answer?