most people are likely to be surprised by the results of milgram’s initial obedience experiment because ________.
James
Guys, does anyone know the answer?
get most people are likely to be surprised by the results of milgram’s initial obedience experiment because ________. from EN Bilgi.
Final Test Flashcards
Flashcard Machine - ― ― ― Home Flashcards
Real Estate & Planning
Final Test
Shared Flashcard Set
Shared Flashcard Set Details
Final Test Quiz 11 24
Real Estate & Planning
Undergraduate 1 05/06/2008
Click here to study/print these flashcards.Create your own flash cards! Sign up here.Additional Real Estate & Planning Flashcards
Additional Real Estate & Planning Flashcards Cards
Term
Most people are likely to be surprised by the results of Milgram's initial obedience experiment because:Definition
the "teachers" were more obedient than most people would have predicted.Term
Poverty and unemployment are likely to be explained in terms of personal dispositions by ________ and in terms of situational influences by ________.Definition
political conservatives; political liberalsTerm
The enduring traditions, ideas, attitudes, and behaviors shared by a large group of people define their:Definition
cultureTerm
[image]The bystander effect refers to the tendency for an observer of an emergency to withhold aid if the:Definition
emergency is being observed by a number of other people.Term
In Milgram's obedience experiments, "teachers" were most likely to deliver high levels of shock when:Definition
the experiment was conducted at a prestigious institution such as Yale University.Term
Which of the following comments is most likely to be made in a group characterized by groupthink?Definition
We all seem to be in basic agreement, so there's no sense in continuing our discussion of this issue."Term
We have a tendency to explain the behavior of others in terms of ________ and to explain our own behavior in terms of ________.Definition
personality traits; situational constraintsTerm
Deindividuation refers toDefinition
a loss of self-awareness and self-restraint in group situations that foster arousal and anonymity.Term
The discomfort we feel when two thoughts are inconsistent is called:Definition
cognitive dissonance.Term
[image]Solomon Asch reported that individuals conformed to a group's judgment of the lengths of lines:
Definition
even when the group judgment was clearly incorrectTerm
The best explanation for the inaction of bystanders during the Kitty Genovese murder is that they failed toDefinition
assume personal responsibility for helping the victim.Term
Most children believe their school is better than the other schools in their town. This best illustrates:Definition
ingroup biasTerm
A social trap is a situation in whichDefinition
the pursuit of self-interest leads to collective harmTerm
Normative social influence results from peoples' desire toDefinition
gain social approvalTerm
Sara, a 20-year-old college sophomore, is very beautiful. Research suggests that she is likely to ________ than less attractive college women.Definition
be perceived as more socially skilledTerm
Expert pool players were observed to make 71 percent of their shots while alone. When four people watched them, they made 80 percent of their shots. This best illustrates:Definition
social facilitationTerm
[image]Philip Zimbardo devised a simulated prison and randomly assigned college students to serve as prisoners or guards. This experiment best illustrates the impact of:
Definition
role playing on attitudesTerm
Attribution theory was designed to account for:Definition
how people explain others' behavior.Term
According to Milgram, the most fundamental lesson to be learned from his study of obedience is that:Definition
even ordinary people, who are not usually hostile, can become agents of destructionTerm
[image]In order to distinguish sense from nonsense, Myers and Jeeves suggest that Christian psychologists ought toDefinition
adopt a scientific empirical approachTerm
Political pollsters find that people's attitudes toward the presidential candidates are very accurate predictors of the election outcome. This best illustrates that attitudes guide our actions when the attitude:Definition
is specifically relevant to the behavior.Term
Carol is restless during class because her professor's distressed facial expressions lead her to believe that he dislikes teaching. The professor, on the other hand, is distressed because he sees Carol's restlessness as an indication that she lacks any motivation to learn. At this point, both student and professor should be informed of the dangers of:Definition
the fundamental attribution error.Term
Attitudes are ________ that guide behaviorDefinition
beliefs and feelingsTerm
After they had first agreed to display a 3-inch "Be a Safe Driver" sign, California home owners were highly likely to permit the installation of a very large and unattractive "Drive Carefully" sign in their front yards. This best illustrates:Definition
the foot-in-the-door phenomenonSource : www.flashcardmachine.com
Solved QUESTION 31 Most people are likely to be surprised by
Answer to Solved QUESTION 31 Most people are likely to be surprised by
Skip to main content
Question: QUESTION 31 Most People Are Likely To Be Surprised By The Results Of Milgram's Initial Obedience Experiment Because O A The "Learmers" Obediently Accepted Painful Shocks Without Any Protest O B. The "Teachers Actually Enjoyed Shocking Another Person C The "Teachers" Were More Obedient Than Most People Would Have Predicted D The "Learmers Made So Few Learning
Show transcribed image text
Expert Answer
31. The correct answer is Option C. Milgram’s study revealed that the teachers were more obedient than what…
View the full answer
Transcribed image text: QUESTION 31 Most people are likely to be surprised by the results of Milgram's initial obedience experiment because O A the "learmers" obediently accepted painful shocks without any protest O B. the "teachers actually enjoyed shocking another person C the "teachers" were more obedient than most people would have predicted D the "learmers made so few learning errors under stressful circumstances. QUESTION 32 People sometimes feel less personally accountable and less concemed about what others think of them when acting as part of a group This most clearly contrbutes to O A social loafing OB social facilitation C group polarization. D cognitive dissonance. QUESTION 33 A group of homophobic high school students discussed prejudice against gays O A deindividuation ( B the chameleon effect u ng the conversation their attitudes beca ne even more pre diced This best ifustrates C. social facilitation OD group polarization. QUESTION 34 Which of the following comments is most likely to be made in a group characterized by groupthink? A "To proceed democratically, we need to know the honest opmons of all group memben B-Do any of you see any potential problem with our group's position?" o C. We all seem to be in basic agreement, so there's no sense in continuing our discussion of this issue OD "As a group, we have to think carefully about all the pros and cons surrounding this issue QUESTION 35 Observing yourself on a video replay is most likely to increase your tendency to atthibute your behavior to A cognitive dissonance B. atitudes OC personality traits D role playing
© 2003-2022 Chegg Inc. All rights reserved.
Milgram Experiment
The Milgram Shock Experiment
By Saul McLeod, updated 2017
One of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology was carried out by Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University. He conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience.
Milgram (1963) examined justifications for acts of genocide offered by those accused at the World War II, Nuremberg War Criminal trials. Their defense often was based on "obedience" - that they were just following orders from their superiours.
The experiments began in July 1961, a year after the trial of Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem. Milgram devised the experiment to answer the question:
Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?" (Milgram, 1974).
Article ContentMilgram's Experiment
Milgram's Agency Theory
Milgram Experiment Variations
Critical Evaluation Ethical Issues References
The Milgram Shock Experiment
Milgram (1963) wanted to investigate whether Germans were particularly obedient to authority figures as this was a common explanation for the Nazi killings in World War II.
Milgram selected participants for his experiment by newspaper advertising for male participants to take part in a study of learning at Yale University.
The procedure was that the participant was paired with another person and they drew lots to find out who would be the ‘learner’ and who would be the ‘teacher.’ The draw was fixed so that the participant was always the teacher, and the learner was one of Milgram’s confederates (pretending to be a real participant).
The learner (a confederate called Mr. Wallace) was taken into a room and had electrodes attached to his arms, and the teacher and researcher went into a room next door that contained an electric shock generator and a row of switches marked from 15 volts (Slight Shock) to 375 volts (Danger: Severe Shock) to 450 volts (XXX).
Milgram's Experiment
Aim:
Milgram (1963) was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person.
Stanley Milgram was interested in how easily ordinary people could be influenced into committing atrocities, for example, Germans in WWII.
Procedure:
Volunteers were recruited for a controlled experiment investigating “learning” (re: ethics: deception). Participants were 40 males, aged between 20 and 50, whose jobs ranged from unskilled to professional, from the New Haven area. They were paid $4.50 for just turning up.
At the beginning of the experiment, they were introduced to another participant, who was a confederate of the experimenter (Milgram).
They drew straws to determine their roles – learner or teacher – although this was fixed and the confederate was always the learner. There was also an “experimenter” dressed in a gray lab coat, played by an actor (not Milgram).
Two rooms in the Yale Interaction Laboratory were used - one for the learner (with an electric chair) and another for the teacher and experimenter with an electric shock generator.
The “learner” (Mr. Wallace) was strapped to a chair with electrodes. After he has learned a list of word pairs given him to learn, the "teacher" tests him by naming a word and asking the learner to recall its partner/pair from a list of four possible choices.
The teacher is told to administer an electric shock every time the learner makes a mistake, increasing the level of shock each time. There were 30 switches on the shock generator marked from 15 volts (slight shock) to 450 (danger – severe shock).
The learner gave mainly wrong answers (on purpose), and for each of these, the teacher gave him an electric shock. When the teacher refused to administer a shock, the experimenter was to give a series of orders/prods to ensure they continued.
There were four prods and if one was not obeyed, then the experimenter (Mr. Williams) read out the next prod, and so on.
Prod 1: Please continue.Prod 2: The experiment requires you to continue.Prod 3: It is absolutely essential that you continue.Prod 4: You have no other choice but to continue.Results:
65% (two-thirds) of participants (i.e., teachers) continued to the highest level of 450 volts. All the participants continued to 300 volts.
Milgram did more than one experiment – he carried out 18 variations of his study. All he did was alter the situation (IV) to see how this affected obedience (DV).
Conclusion:
The individual explanation for the behaviour of the participants would be that it was something about them as people that caused them to obey, but a more realistic explanation is that the situation they were in influenced them and caused them to behave in the way that they did.
Guys, does anyone know the answer?